BALCA held that the letters the employer sent to U.S. applicants were insufficient, noting that there was no attempt to determine whether they could become qualified with reasonable on-the-job training and there was no proof that the applicants received the letters. (Matter of Twins, 11/1/13). Read the BALCA case here.
BALCA reversed the denial, finding the omission of a Spanish language requirement in the Notice of Filing was not by itself fatal to the application where the overall text of the NOF was sufficient to apprise U.S. workers of the job opportunity. (Matter of Architectural Stone Accents, 7/3/13). Read the BALCA case here.
BALCA found the employer's ads unduly restrictive, where the employer listed "Houston, TX" (the place of the beneficiary's residence) as the geographic area of employment, when in fact, the position is more flexible and allows the person to work from home. (Matter of Siemen's, 7/23/13). Read the BALCA case here.
BALCA found that the U.S. worker's lack of special skills was a lawful, job-related reason for rejection, and that the employer's failure to identify the requirements for the U.S. worker's previous position did not warrant denial. (Matter of Cisco Systems, 4/26/13) [Courtesy - AILA] Read the BALCA case.
BALCA found that where an employer attestation in the recruitment report is submitted as evidence of recruitment on the employer's website in lieu of dated screenshots, the attestation must be in affidavit form. (Matter of DGN Technologies, 4/29/13) [Courtesy - AILA] Read the BALCA case.
Noting that the job description was written in plural terms, BALCA found that the ads clearly included multiple positions, were not misleading, and did not cause confusion that would prevent potential U.S. applicants from applying. (Matter of Microsoft Corp., 4/12/13). [Courtesy-AILA] Read the BALCA decision.
BALCA reversed the denial, finding that the CO ignored the employer's experience requirements stated in Item H-14 and incorrectly interpreted the alternative education requirements as alternative employment requirements. (Matter of General Electric Co., 1/22/13) Read the BALCA decision. [Courtesy - AILA]
BALCA reversed denial because evidence demonstrated that the employer entered the actual minimum requirements into the job order form, but that a deficient form caused those requirements to be converted. (Matter of Cognizant Technology Solutions US Corp., 11/29/12). Read the BALCA decision (PDF).
BALCA found that the employer did not mislead U.S. workers where the ads stated the position was located in San Francisco and may require multiple long-term regional assignments but the ETA 9089 listed Fremont, the company's headquarters. (Matter of Infosys, 11/16/12). Read the BALCA decision (PDF).
BALCA affirmed the denial where the attorney failed to sign the ETA 9089 submitted with the audit response, noting that the instructions provide clear notice to the employer that the 9089 must be signed by the attorney or agent. (Matter of TLH Construction, 8/19/10). Read the BALCA document. (pdf).